ELIZABETH KELLEY

Mental DisabilitY BLOG.

  • HOME
  • BIO
  • BOOKS
  • FAQS
  • NEWSLETTERS & PRESS
  • MENTAL DISABILITY BLOG
  • FEDERAL PRACTICE
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • CONTACT

6/13/2022

Alabama Overturns Death Sentence Due to Mental Disability

0 Comments

Read Now
 
Picture
​In September 2018, the Alabama Supreme Court voted 5-4 to overturn the death sentence of a man convicted in a 2009 robbery and shooting that led to the death of a man. The ruling came after the United States Supreme Court ordered Alabama courts to reconsider the death sentence for Anthony Lane in 2015, stating that states cannot execute individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Alabama attorney general’s office conceded that the trial court should not have sentenced Lane to death and joined in the defense’s motion.  
 
Atkins v. Virginia
 
In the case of Atkins v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities violated the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The Court stated that the Eighth Amendment should be read in light on the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a mature society.” The Court cited the fact that a number of states had begun to outlaw the execution of the intellectually disabled and saw a consistency in the direction of change on the issue. The Court left it to the discretion of individual states to set guidelines in determining whether an individual had an intellectual disability that would prevent their execution.
 
Hall v. Florida
 
In Hall v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the standard states may use in determining whether an individual sentenced to death has an intellectual disability that would prevent execution. Florida had established a bright-line rule that anyone with an IQ over 70 was eligible for execution. The Court found that states had to go beyond IQ measurements in determining eligibility and stated that a rigid rule could lead to the execution of individuals with mental disabilities. A defendant must be able to introduce evidence in addition to IQ scores that show things such as the inability to learn basic skills and adapt to changes.
 
Anthony Lane
 
In the Alabama case, Lane had an IQ of 70 and it was undisputed that his intellectual functioning was significantly below average. The dispute in the lower courts centered around whether Lane had the requisite deficits in adaptive skills that would render him intellectually disabled. A medical expert determined that Lane lacked the fundamental social and practical skills that would make him eligible for execution. 
 
If you or a loved one with a mental disability has been arrested or convicted of a crime, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney on your side. Elizabeth Kelley specializes in representing individuals with mental illnesses and intellectual and developmental disabilities. To schedule a consultation call (509) 991-7058.

Share

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

Details

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

East Coast 
​
Elizabeth Kelley, Attorney at Law
5 Columbus Circle, Ste. 710
New York, NY 10019
West Coast
Elizabeth Kelley, Attorney at Law
2525 E 29th Ave., Ste. 10-B #225
Spokane, WA 99223
phone: 509.991.7058
email: zealousadvocacy@aol.com
Nothing contained on this website is to be considered as the rendering of legal advice for specific cases, and readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel.
  • HOME
  • BIO
  • BOOKS
  • FAQS
  • NEWSLETTERS & PRESS
  • MENTAL DISABILITY BLOG
  • FEDERAL PRACTICE
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • CONTACT